From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a73e561812bfa0d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-17 04:37:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [GNAT commercial USE] -- can i use GNAT to develop a closed source commercial application ? Date: 17 Aug 2003 12:35:57 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <20030815093016.00005ce8._elh_@_terma_._com_> <3F3DA297.1000406@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1061120248 15253 62.49.19.209 (17 Aug 2003 11:37:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:37:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41628 Date: 2003-08-17T12:35:57+01:00 List-Id: "Robert I. Eachus" writes: > Simon Wright wrote: > > > Nor would GCC's C, C++ compilers be, of course. > > I expect you could get GNAT certified, but you would have to pay ACT > > quite a bit of money. > It doesn't cost that much to get a validated version of GNAT. Come to think, the quote was for an early run of the certification process -- it's cheaper if you can agree to defer to a convenient moment, I guess, perfectly reasonable.