From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5d05ccde5cefb836
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Blocking protected ops (was: Tasks and C/C++ code)
Date: 1998/11/30
Message-ID: <x7vogppt0bk.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 417425387
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
References: <x7vlnkzx7ok.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>
 <F35sAE.Csu.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 912507727 nnrp-07:11792 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
Organization: At Home
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes:

> Simon Wright (simon@pogner.demon.co.uk) wrote:
> : ...
> : I for one understood the language of 9.5.8 as meaning that _only_ the
>                                        ^^^^^ 9.5.1

oops, yes, I meant 9.5.1(8)

> : operations stated in 9-16 are 'potentially blocking', ie the list is a

.. and (9)..(16)

> : definition of what it is to be 'potentially blocking' and hence
> : subject to possible checking by the runtime.