From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,adb01e044e3e5aec X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-01 23:44:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Hints for networking Date: 02 Feb 2003 07:43:19 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1044171858 14057 62.49.19.209 (2 Feb 2003 07:44:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 07:44:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33692 Date: 2003-02-02T07:43:19+00:00 List-Id: Jano <402450@cepsz.unizar.es> writes: > Must I detect machine endingness manually? Are there helping > packages for networking in the wild? I think that there are theoretical circumstances in which it is not OK to check whether system.default_bit_order is low_order_first (little-endian) or high_order_first (big-endian), but that has worked for me on Sparc, Alpha, PowerPC, Intel (GNAT in all cases).