From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,59a642644fac1faa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-14 09:15:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: debbuger or unit test tool Date: 14 Feb 2004 17:11:32 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1076778904 21750 62.49.19.209 (14 Feb 2004 17:15:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:15:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5571 Date: 2004-02-14T17:11:32+00:00 List-Id: orvio@yahoo.com (orvio) writes: > In other case, can anyone suggest me another tool for ADA unit test? We are happy with AUnit . We did evaluate VectorCast, I don't remember the details but my _impression_ was that the possible advantage of being able to change the test script without recompilation was not so big an advantage on fast hardware. Also we had trouble getting it to understand our (complex GNAT) compilation environment. -- Simon Wright 100% Ada, no bugs.