From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,63585ba5c5be8595
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ada to Motif bindings
Date: 2000/04/11
Message-ID: <x7vln2lmatq.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 609969534
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
References: <38E8E8CE.81EC851F@mitre.org> <38EAC651.1DD94F40@home.com>
 <8cffvp$q0s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38EC2DC6.E17A407B@home.com>
 <dale-E9137D.14235906042000@news.rmit.edu.au> <38F17693.F32F2074@home.com>
 <8ct3pv$cnl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 955517396 nnrp-10:20413 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
Organization: At Home
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:

> As an aside, I have seen X/Motif bindings that made the whole X/Motif
> subsystem task-safe by wrapping a synchronizing task around all the
> calls. This actually *removes* a potential source of errors that C X
> coders have to deal with. :-)

Or, with X11R6 (OK, your X vendor needs to have built X with threading
support :), use XInitThreads(), XtToolkitThreadInitialize() (but I
don't know what happens with Motif).