From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2beee871357c199d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: need editor
Date: 1999/09/08
Message-ID: <x7vk8q16uma.fsf@pogner.moho>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 522816731
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
References: <37d005ee.0@10.1.254.4> <37D54437.3D9108C5@res.raytheon.com>
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 936853894 nnrp-12:14960 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
Organization: At Home
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 1999-09-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

John J Cupak Jr <John_J_Cupak@res.raytheon.com> writes:

> I dunno about others, but I've found that the GRASP/pcGRASP editors
> are great for editing, compiling, and linking Ada95 code.

Just my 2p's worth -- these are fine if you are

* working on your own, or with others who are also GRASP users. GRASP
  has its own opinion on layout, and GRASP-formatted code looks
  revolting in other editors.

* not using any revision control system. Needless layout changes
  obscure the actual changes you intended.