From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1ebf2068074538a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-25 12:49:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!194.42.224.136!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!zap!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Legality: formal packages with controlled types Date: 25 Nov 2001 10:38:03 +0000 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <3BFFE574.738FBD65@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1006721336 nnrp-12:9228 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Nov 2001 10:38:03 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16951 Date: 2001-11-25T10:38:03+00:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Carter writes: > The code compiles without error with GNAT 3.13p/Win98. Yes, I know, but I have found that sometimes OA is right under these circumstances!