From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a327d56b3d5e9a4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-09 06:20:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Booch: iterator invalidation Date: 09 Nov 2002 14:20:05 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <3dcbb4e4$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1036851600 7202 62.49.19.209 (9 Nov 2002 14:20:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:20:00 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30642 Date: 2002-11-09T14:20:05+00:00 List-Id: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes: > What are conditions when Booch iterators are invalidated? > It is missing in the documentation. Point taken. > It also would be great to have the debug version of Booch, checking > validity of iterators and raising an exception. With GNAT it can be > done as in C by #ifdef/#endif preprocessor directives (assigning a > long (may be 64, 128, or 256 bytes) counter incrementing on each > invalidation to each container and analogous counters to iterators > and comparing these counters). I am not going to include GNAT-specific stuff in the BCs if I can help it (and if there are any such I will do my best to remove them, just let me know!).