From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2078dddcdcd8d83 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion :-) [was: assign help!!] Date: 1997/05/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241171535 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk [158.152.70.98] References: <5kjvcv$evt@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw> <5kn8ko$jcc@top.mitre.org> <1997May7.201035.2439@nosc.mil> <33727EEA.2092@sprintmail.com> <5kuf1j$17vi@uni.library.ucla.edu> <3373666A.31DFF4F5@spam.innocon.com> <3373EAB5.73A0@sprintmail.com> <33755EF7.1A8F@erols.com> Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Aaron Metzger writes: > I hope > you don't propose suffixes such as _Pointer, (or others that I combat > daily --> _Record, _List, _Array) for any type names that are exposed in > package specs. Since access types are so important in class-wide programming (Rationale II.2) I think their names will have to be visible sometimes. -- Simon Wright Work Email: simon.j.wright@gecm.com GEC-Marconi Radar & Defence Systems Voice: +44(0)1705-701778 Command & Information Systems Divsion FAX: +44(0)1705-701800