From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1983ae2deb642ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 01:05:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada -vs- GNAT Date: 25 May 2002 08:52:14 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1022313868 nnrp-10:12916 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24731 Date: 2002-05-25T08:52:14+01:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org writes: > >from the Booch Components, which are meant to be, and to a large > >extent are, compiler-independent. On the other hand, given that GNAT > >is my preferred compiler (for all sorts of reasons), I felt quite > >happy to use 'Object_Size when appropriate. > Which is like being a little bit pregnant. It means the potential > user must: switch to Gnat; start a new branch of the update tree; or > not use your package. It makes life simpler for you, harder for > your users, and (possibly) richer for ACT. Just remember all those > consequences of your decision. :blush: what I meant to say was that, _in a different project_ (ColdFrame) I did this. The BCs are spotless. Sorry, all.