From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-13 13:54:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died) Date: 13 May 2003 21:53:46 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305060521.400f1d80@posting.google.com> <82347202.0305061103.2ddd98e4@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305070504.6866e7a3@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305070929.2d7a0d4c@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305081222.623e0b31@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.03051205Followup-To: comp.lang.ada NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1052859256 25961 62.49.19.209 (13 May 2003 20:54:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:54:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37298 Date: 2003-05-13T21:53:46+01:00 List-Id: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > In article , Dr Chaos writes: > > On 12 May 2003 06:43:34 -0700, soft-eng wrote: > >> Dr Chaos wrote in message news:... > >> > >>> Here is one key example. VMS didn't have a shell where actual > >>> ordinary users could write programs which functioned like the built in > >>> ones. It was "RUN MY_USER_PROGRAM" versus the huge hairball of "SHOW > >>> THIS/THAT" or "SET THIS TO THAT". > > It is too bad you missed the SET COMMAND documentation, but that is not > really our fault, is it. Most of my work used the "foreign command" feature (and continues to do so, last updated in 1985 I think! That was a mix of Fortran, Pascal, Macro & DCL ...)