From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4f40de4bb311cbe6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-16 14:23:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat Bug detected? Date: 16 Jul 2003 22:21:52 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <3F1560EA.FD75ABAF@raytheon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1058390580 27183 62.49.19.209 (16 Jul 2003 21:23:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:23:00 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40357 Date: 2003-07-16T22:21:52+01:00 List-Id: Mark Johnson writes: > Timo Warns wrote: > > > > Can someone confirm following bug? > > [snip] > I get it as well w/ GNAT 5.01w (a May 8 wavefront). Based on that > result, I doubt it is fixed in 3.16a1 (last customer release) but it > will take a while before I have time to test it. I suggest a message to > ACT is in order. Still present in 3.16a1.