From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,791530e499e6a7f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: ada writing guide Date: 2000/04/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 611899776 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 References: <8d1rso$bir$2@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <8d1vhj$hdr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8d2hig$7e6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38F5DF8C.1A01E5A4@utech.net> <8d4t07$o15$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8d9nrq$th$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 955905176 nnrp-13:1396 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net Date: 2000-04-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar writes: > In article <8d4t07$o15$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, > Ted Dennison wrote: > > > I don't mind this so much. But there is a small problem with > > it. Emacs Ada mode (at least my version of it) > > I think you can safely assume that if I say something is > standard GNAT mode, then EMACS Ada mode handles it fine > (remember that the maintainer of EMACS Ada mode works for > ACT/Europe :-) > > SO you are using an old version of EMACS. Well, is it really the case that this procedure Foo( D : in out Data; C : in Data); is the behaviour of old Emacses? It's the way adamode-3.4b behaves on emacs 20.3 .. not all that old really. And perfectly reasonable behaviour too! if it can stop just one person using those horrible dangling open parens it will be worth it .. I tried it with a dangling close paren too, procedure Foo( D : in out Data; C : in Data ); which is way too clever, can't we come up with some scheme to make this really revolting?!