From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,539c04254abf1b37
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-03 03:47:07 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.86.7.162!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!shale.ftech.net!news.ftech.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!zap!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: compiler benchmark comparisons (was: naval systems)
Date: 02 Mar 2002 18:20:26 +0000
Organization: Pushface
Message-ID: <x7vg03i3k7p.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
References: <3C74E519.3F5349C4@baesystems.com>
 <qFRe8.1032$jt4.495646881@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
 <u3czoxbjm.fsf@telus.net>
 <VuSe8.61199$K14.517462149@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <uzo1vx3w2.fsf@telus.net>
 <JmVe8.61213$nL7.532654192@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <a5hp7k$8q61@news.cis.okstate.edu> <3C7D37FD.F67F7067@despammed.com>
 <17247c3d.0202271553.68aaf78d@posting.google.com>
 <338040f8.0202271819.373f733a@Organization: LJK Software
 <TgAW8WWqYgP5@eisner.encompasserve.org> <5ee5b646.0203011129.1bdbac56@po
 <ug03ji5ow.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1015155984 nnrp-13:5783 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Mar 2002 18:20:26 GMT
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20717
Date: 2002-03-02T18:20:26+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> writes:

> To goes even farther I find the GNAT -gnaty option very nice. You
> can write on paper rules about laying out of code and syntax but if
> the compiler does not check that who will ????

I quite agree, it saves endless disagreement about style. Our project
has accepted my recommendation that we use it (plain -gnaty, no fancy
messing, why write -gnaty3abcefhiklmprst !!)