From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e36dd27fb9ed9db3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-25 12:15:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Compiling only specification with gcc (GNAT)
Date: 25 Jun 2002 19:59:42 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Sender: simon@smaug
Message-ID: <x7vfzzbchgh.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <3D177031.2050003@yahoo.com> <u1yawmk56.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1025032478 nnrp-13:3414 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26700
Date: 2002-06-25T19:59:42+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:

> David Rasmussen <pinkfloydhomer@yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> > Is there a way to "compile" an .ads file only with gcc 3.1 ? I want an
> > error if it isn't valid, and ok if it's ok.
> 
> gcc foo.ads

   gcc -c foo.ads                     will fail if there should be a body
   gcc -c -gnats foo.ads              for just a syntax check

or even

   gnatmake -c foo.ads
   gnatmake -c -gnats foo.ads