From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d89b08801f2aacae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-01 22:10:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is strong typing worth the cost? Date: 02 May 2002 06:00:45 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <9gBz8.4054$%r1.2380315867@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1020316178 nnrp-10:4074 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23391 Date: 2002-05-02T06:00:45+01:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" writes: > However, that's a significantly different > thing than comparing a weak-typed language (such as C) to a strongly typed > language, since Ada still provides a lot of checks on its own defined types > that C does not. (Parameter passing or automatic data conversions are good > examples. Checking those things can result in major reductions in errors - > which Ada does and C does not.) I suppose OP could try ANSI-C-with-prototypes vs original-K&R-C> I am perpetually amazed by folk who don't write prototypes ...