From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e53617e6821a1c7e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-05 10:43:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!freenix!proxad.net!proxad.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Suspicious reentrant semaphore Date: 05 May 2003 18:42:35 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1052156579 2744 62.49.19.209 (5 May 2003 17:42:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 17:42:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36981 Date: 2003-05-05T18:42:35+01:00 List-Id: "Michal Morawski" writes: > Does it works in GNAT? > > I have written the following program, which cannot be compiled > because the construction "then abort" is not understand by the > compiler. It would really really help if you included the compiler's error messages!