From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,34ed393138557f01 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.icl.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Newbie] Amalgamate child units Date: 12 Jun 2004 13:23:57 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <40cacf5b$0$12749$636a15ce@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1087043326 19098 62.49.19.209 (12 Jun 2004 12:28:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:28:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1425 Date: 2004-06-12T13:23:57+01:00 List-Id: "PG" writes: > Hi, > > When I want import some child units, like: > with A, A.B, A.B.B1, A.B.B2, A.C, A.C.C1... > > is it possible to write: with A.* or something else ? No, but with A.B.B1; implies A and A.B, so your sample as far as it goes could be written with A.B.B1; with A.B.B2; with A.C.C1; However I'm not at all sure that it adds to the clarity to do this. It's not obvious, really, that you are in fact interested in A.B ... -- Simon Wright 100% Ada, no bugs.