From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e4bb63e08046e1a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-24 13:10:39 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: is exception when others => null; smart? Date: 24 Oct 2002 21:11:01 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug Message-ID: References: <3DB8204B.2080804@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1035490238 8171 62.49.19.209 (24 Oct 2002 20:10:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:10:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30110 Date: 2002-10-24T21:11:01+01:00 List-Id: Mark Biggar writes: > Probably not. If you want the opposite policy change it to: > > when others => raise; > > BTW, make it an optional feature which way you want it. If you do make it optional, the options should be * have "when others => raise;". * have no handler at all.