From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2c41845dd8e1b7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-13 14:07:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate...)) Date: 13 May 2003 22:07:02 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1052860051 25961 62.49.19.209 (13 May 2003 21:07:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:07:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37302 Date: 2003-05-13T22:07:02+01:00 List-Id: "Chad R. Meiners" writes: > "Stephen Leake" wrote in message > news:u3cjk81gg.fsf@nasa.gov... > > But push it to the extreme, and people will say we should be > > programming in UML, not Ada. > > But that is a foolish argument since UML is not well defined. There is nothing to prevent definition of a subset ('profile') that is rigorously-enough defined to be translated. You can do that with a small core of UML. For example, http://www.projtech.com/