From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d39d8ada86dd39d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-27 08:14:00 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!lore.csc.com!baen1673807.!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon.j.wright@amsjv.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT on Mandrake GNU/Linux 9.0
Date: 27 Sep 2002 15:10:20 +0100
Organization: Alenia Marconi Systems, ISD, Farlington
Sender: sjw@galadriel.frlngtn.gecm.com
Message-ID: <x7v7kh7bk1f.fsf@galadriel.frlngtn.gecm.com>
References: <3d93de6f$1@cpns1.saic.com>
 <slrnap8hit.4db.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3d93f647@cpns1.saic.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.44.241.42
X-Trace: lore.csc.com 1033139637 21142 20.44.241.42 (27 Sep 2002 15:13:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.csc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:13:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: galadriel.frlngtn.gecm.com
X-Original-Trace: 27 Sep 2002 16:13:54 +0100, galadriel.frlngtn.gecm.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29378
Date: 2002-09-27T15:10:20+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Tony Matthews" <tony.matthews@SpamJam.ds-s.com> writes:

> It was reading about the 'unstable' nature of GNAT in GCC 3.2 that
> caused to me seek further clarification from this newgroup
> membership.

I've been running on this Mandrake 8.2 laptop with GCC-3.1, then 3.2,
built from source on my other (Slackware 7.1) box; no obvious
problems. In fact all except one of the problems I have found have
been in 3.15a1 too.

I've had much less grief from GCC-3.2 on Linux than from 3.15a1 on
Windows.