From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,57547e48b4c4d9b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-06 03:57:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: aunit? Date: 06 Apr 2003 10:55:26 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1049626625 28508 62.49.19.209 (6 Apr 2003 10:57:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:57:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35956 Date: 2003-04-06T10:55:26+01:00 List-Id: "chris.danx" writes: > I was wandering about looking for a testing framework as an example > for one I was building in and found JUnit, then found Aunit and now > I'm not gonna bother implementing one at all and get on with the > real problem. Has anyone used it? If so how did you find it? We have been using it and getting on well. The only problem is that the source as supplied doesn't obey ACT's coding style, so if you use -gnaty you get lots of warnings ..