From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,100c539a37d7d2e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-17 00:03:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!nycmny1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!colt.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: chained List manipulation without recusrsion : lost the begining of my List! Date: 17 May 2003 08:03:26 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1053155037 17021 62.49.19.209 (17 May 2003 07:03:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 07:03:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37436 Date: 2003-05-17T08:03:26+01:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff writes: > Simon Wright writes: > > > "Zeg" writes: > > > > Z : Liste := null; > > > > You don't need to initialize access variables, they are automatically > > set to null for you > > True, but I think a good style is to always use explicit initialization > if you are going to depend on the initial "null" (as opposed to just > using it to trip up uninitialized pointers). I suppose we just have to disagree here! (but only a little). To me it feels to be rather like if Boolean_Variable = True then