From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,86ec22e070e319c0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: How do I get this to work?? Date: 1999/01/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 431152915 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 References: <76s0dp$1v4$1@nntp3.uunet.ca> <76tbvv$ba5$1@nntp3.uunet.ca> <770ifd$qui$1@goblin.uunet.ca> <771bl9$sla$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <77b9cp$5kh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 916038462 nnrp-05:19182 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-01-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com writes: > For example, even in the case of calls to interfaced > routines, we far prefer to pass IN or IN OUT parameters > by reference than to pass pointers as a general rule. This remark led me to re-read RM B.3(63) and following; thanks!