From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7844279822ce7c28 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: Newbie question : types , representation Date: 1999/08/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 516264927 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 References: X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 935433379 nnrp-12:24096 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net Date: 1999-08-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Wilhelm Spickermann writes: > type Char_64_Array is array (Sometype) of Char_64; > type Packed_Char_64_Array is new Char_64_Array; > for Packed_Char_64_Array'Component_Size use 6; > pragma Pack (Packed_Char_64_Array); I would be very surprised if this didn't depend on the endianness of your target machine (eg, probably OK on x86, probably not on SPARC)