From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e546de6de24f54e0,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Visibility for operations of formal private extensions
Date: 2000/07/28
Message-ID: <x7v4s5af41m.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 651921682
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 964812255 nnrp-08:14171 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
Organization: At Home
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 2000-07-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

The code below gives compilation errors when compiling the view
conversion in P.Q.R.Proc's body, both in GNAT (3.13a1) and Apex
3.2.0b. They say that there's no visible interpretation: GNAT says

/home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:33:09: no candidate interpretations match the actuals:
/home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:33:15: expected type "New_T" defined at /home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:26
/home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:33:15: found private type "Base" defined at /home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:22
/home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:33:15:   ==> in call to "Proc" at /home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:27
/home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:33:15:   ==> in call to "Proc" at /home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:18(inherited)
/home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:33:15:   ==> in call to "Proc" at /home/simon/tmp/demo.ada:5

If I make P.Proc publicly visible, the compilation goes fine.

I believe we are somewhere near 12.5.1(21) here. My belief that it
should have compiled is based on the following:

* we know that P.Q.R.Base is a P.Q.Q_T

* a P.Q.Q_T (privately) inherits P.Proc

* P.Q.R's body has visiblity of the private part of P and therefore
  should be able to see that P.Q.Q_T inherits P.Proc

Note that P.Q.S's body _can_ see P.Proc.

I tried adding a private component to P.Q.Q_T, P.Q.R.Proc can see it
quite happily .. OK, the LRM reference above is about operations not
data, still!

==================================================================
package P is
    type T is tagged private;
private
    type T is tagged null record;
    procedure Proc (The_T : in out T);
end P;

package body P is
    procedure Proc (The_T : in out T) is
    begin
        null;
    end Proc;
end P;

package P.Q is
    type Q_T is new P.T with private;
private
    type Q_T is new T with null record;
end P.Q;

generic
    type Base is new Q_T with private;
package P.Q.R is
    type New_T is new Base with private;
private
    type New_T is new Base with null record;
    procedure Proc (The_T : in out New_T);
end P.Q.R;

package body P.Q.R is
    procedure Proc (The_T : in out New_T) is
    begin
        Proc (Base (The_T));
    end Proc;
end P.Q.R;

package P.Q.S is
    type S_T is new Q_T with private;
private
    type S_T is new Q_T with null record;
    procedure Proc (The_T : in out S_T);
end P.Q.S;

package body P.Q.S is
    procedure Proc (The_T : in out S_T) is
    begin
        Proc (Q_T (The_T));
    end Proc;
end P.Q.S;

with P.Q.R;
with P.Q.S;
package U is
    package U_P is new P.Q.R (Base => P.Q.S.S_T);
end U;