From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1983ae2deb642ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 04:38:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada -vs- GNAT Date: 25 May 2002 12:23:23 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug Message-ID: References: <5ee5b646.0205250304.3ea43104@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1022326644 nnrp-01:19238 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24750 Date: 2002-05-25T12:23:23+01:00 List-Id: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: > Simon Wright wrote in message news:... > > > Of course pragma Warnings is implementation-defined too. > > But absolutely essential in my view. Because it is very important to > always compile with warnings turned on, but it is in the nature of > warnings to generate false positives sometimes, and you need a way > of turning them off. I completely agree.