From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e06a8814dbc90113 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: gnat 3.12p with gcc 2.95.2 Date: 2000/05/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 626407625 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 References: <3928E9D2.70DBF0B4@mathematik.uni-dortmund.de> X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 959111380 nnrp-11:747 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net Date: 2000-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jens Acker writes: > Is it possible to build a complete gnat 3.12p system > on top of the gcc 2.95.2 compiler suite instead of > the gcc 2.8.1 compiler ? > I found only patches for gcc 2.8.1 in the distribution > and the precompiled binaries were with gcc 2.8.1. It may be possible but it's probably a bad idea. ACT don't recommend it. Have a look at http://www.pogner.demon.co.uk/gnatfe/ for a workround that lets you use your 2.95 C, C++, (Fortran??) compiler while continuing to use your 2.81-based GNAT.