From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d8a4797a79f9c90f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-26 07:13:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!colt.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: I/O - exception handling Date: 26 May 2003 15:12:45 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1053958402 15834 62.49.19.209 (26 May 2003 14:13:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 14:13:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37784 Date: 2003-05-26T15:12:45+01:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol writes: > In stead of when others => why don't you check which exception > occurred? > > You have Name_Error, Use_Error, Device_Error, End_Error etc... Yes, but OP probably did other not-shown stuff which could have raised any exception ..