From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 14:31:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X (Ada.Sockets)
Date: 04 Jun 2003 22:30:48 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Sender: simon@smaug
Message-ID: <x7v3cip5y47.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbd6rkk.31i.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <L2MAa.13584$sJ4.6809@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
 <3ED4A94C.2020501@noplace.com> <3ed4c9a2@news.wineasy.se>
 <3ED4EB4E.6050108@cogeco.ca> <S9qicyCF6aHW@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <ez8Ba.14446$Mu3.300872@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>
 <wccptm2ydik.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <mWpBa.16582$8g5.278184@news2.e.nsc.no> <3ED63B23.5040308@cogeco.ca>
 <3ed7278b@news.wineasy.se> <3ED79241.2060908@cogeco.ca>
 <x7vsmqwf7dq.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> <3EDBBB1B.9060001@cogeco.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1054762284 1825 62.49.19.209 (4 Jun 2003 21:31:24
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:31:24 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.93
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38644
Date: 2003-06-04T22:30:48+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@cogeco.ca> writes:

> However, if you decide that GNAT only is good enough, then there is
> still the issue of whether or not ACT will leave
> "System.Stream_Attributes, in s-stratt.adb" alone. Or will it
> change?

It was possible to use earlier versions (3.14p, I think) with 3.15a1,
no trouble, so it stands a good chance of staying & still being
useful.

> Certainly there is a lot of flexibility when it comes to your own
> personal pet project(s) that the world never sees. I see a larger
> issue with code I want to publish however.

I suppose that's different from use in a project, the people who might
have trouble and end up cursing you when it does fall over are too
widely distributed to take many risks with!