From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b479e85cddd6bd6a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-29 04:04:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!news.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and GEDCOM Date: 29 Jul 2003 06:04:42 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3F25C39D.F91B8346@mchsi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1059476648 12403 192.135.80.34 (29 Jul 2003 11:04:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40935 Date: 2003-07-29T06:04:42-05:00 List-Id: In article , Wesley Groleau writes: > Bruce or Tracy Jacobs wrote: > >> I actually starting writing some for my mother who was >> needing to convert some genealogy records. The code is >> about 3/4 written. > > Just curious. Of course there's tons in C and Java, > and I've found (and written a little) in perl. Are you > considering "publishing" any you've written? Want any > help with it? > > I'm just not happy with the assumptions that all genealogy > programs force on us. Even the most flexible and "open-minded" > (LifeLines) wasn't flexible enough for me, and so I now just > edit my GEDCOM with a plain text editor (pass it through LifeLines > or something solely for error checking). You sound quite experienced. What are the limitations of Reunion ? > So anything that I write or someone else writes to simplify > my work without tying my hands on some major point....