From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ee0dc912649d50d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!prodigy.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!newsfeed1.sea.pnap.net!newsfeed2.sea.pnap.net!newsfeed.pnap.net!brmea-news-1.sun.com!news1nwk.sfbay.sun.com!new-usenet.uk.sun.com!not-for-mail From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada DB bindings and APQ Date: 15 Dec 2004 09:19:33 +0100 Organization: Sun Microsystems Message-ID: References: <1km3c584awura$.y7djkir1ozya$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: khepri06.norway.sun.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: new-usenet.uk.sun.com 1103098778 14166 129.159.112.195 (15 Dec 2004 08:19:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@new-usenet.uk.sun.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Dec 2004 08:19:38 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6956 Date: 2004-12-15T08:19:38+00:00 List-Id: >>>>> "GB" == Georg Bauhaus writes: GB> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: GB> : On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:29:16 +0000 (UTC), Georg Bauhaus wrote: GB> : GB> :> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: GB> :>: On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:25:22 -0500, Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote: GB> :>: Yep, the first error one gets: lpq not found. libpq.a is not distributed GB> :>: with GNAT. This might become a problem in the future. GB> :> GB> :> I'm not at all surprised that when I use a binding but not the bound GB> :> thing, I'll get an error. GB> : GB> : Does your OS complain about all devices you could potentially attach via GB> : USB? GB> It is surprising if binding to the operating system fails. GB> Driver not installed? GB> :>: Yes, but from user's perspective, at least one query per connection is GB> :>: always necessary. In some cases the user will need more, but not so often. GB> :> GB> :> I doubt this very much. Indeed, we have a server type application GB> :> that does not work at all without a connection pool, because performance GB> :> is affected rather drastically when you control connections. GB> : GB> : OK, but this does not contradict my point. GB> When you said, "but not so often," and I said, "doubt this very much", GB> (then gave just one example) I wanted to say that many DBes typically GB> _are_ queried frequently, in Hz. Yes, a large server will typically have a transaction rate of several thousand transactions per second. GB> -- Georg -- C++: The power, elegance and simplicity of a hand grenade.