From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9a5f3bd162009c01 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.compaq.com!newsfeed1.sea.pnap.net!newsfeed.pnap.net!brmea-news-1.sun.com!news1nwk.sfbay.sun.com!new-usenet.uk.sun.com!not-for-mail From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005: Too clever by half? Date: 29 Sep 2005 11:12:07 +0200 Organization: Sun Microsystems Message-ID: References: <70e0e$4331acfc$4995583$14979@ALLTEL.NET> <87hdcew7wq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1127511077.919641.107390@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <43357152$0$16476$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <4335bc15$0$26227$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: khepri06.norway.sun.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: new-usenet.uk.sun.com 1127985350 10256 129.159.112.195 (29 Sep 2005 09:15:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@new-usenet.uk.sun.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Sep 2005 09:15:50 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5267 Date: 2005-09-29T09:15:50+00:00 List-Id: I think it is getting better, although on my office PC, the driver for the on-board sound system does not work properly, for example. For graphic cards, I think you can use any XFree86 driver. Also, the latest version of Solaris promises to be compatible with Linux on a system-call level. A list of supported hardware can be found at http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl Also note that Solaris is now open source, but make sure to read the license.... >>>>> "SW" == Simon Wright writes: SW> Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen writes: GB> Simon Wright wrote: >> >> It certainly seems to be true that, no matter how daft you or I might >> >> think it, management would prefer to use Windows to develop on. >> You can run Solaris on almost any Intel box as well.... SW> It's the cost of the outsourced support (often more per year than the SW> cost of the hardware), and the management effort that would be SW> necessary to beat the outsource supplier down to a sensible price per SW> seat. SW> You and I know that Solaris is going to be less trouble to support, SW> but lack of familiarity breeds fear. SW> Last time I looked, Solaris was rather picky about the hardware it ran SW> on .. has that changed? -- C++: The power, elegance and simplicity of a hand grenade.