From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7684e927a2475d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!bcklog1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.sun.com!news.sun.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:51:14 -0500 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other licenses related questions... References: <449d2a28$0$11075$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <449d5c03$0$11074$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <6sbqsh6jv7.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen Organization: Sun Microsystems Date: 27 Jun 2006 12:51:14 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cache-Post-Path: news1nwk!unknown@techra25.norway.sun.com X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.18.43.249 X-Trace: sv3-bfLi2J7WHVs0Q/vlakO1vo/sX/H52ha3Ex+Q41vjGbUs4ULSoXUpSPTQnK7Rj74ufyucaCvsMEJNGCr!xLdnG4ET1okd3g+WBCJTJSGE4R042xxNaXBK1M/pT3arhsnkGBAlR3uv8dl3hEDI0nqFZQxCoyou!yg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@sun.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@sun.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5055 Date: 2006-06-27T12:51:14+02:00 List-Id: No. Sorry about the 'we', I was thinking about the Ada community as a whole. My employer is rather actively pushing Java :-) >>>>> "DAK" == Dmitry A Kazakov writes: DAK> On 27 Jun 2006 09:26:26 +0200, Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen wrote: >> Completely agree. The current licensing model of GNAT does very little >> to promote the growth of Ada, but brings a lot of FUD. Once again we >> are shooting ourselves in the foot. DAK> Are you an ACT employee? (:-)) Otherwise, agree, probably they do DAK> themselves... DAK> -- DAK> Regards, DAK> Dmitry A. Kazakov DAK> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de -- C++: The power, elegance and simplicity of a hand grenade.