From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,47bc849aad30d586 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-10 05:32:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!bin4.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Sender: Stephe@TAKVER Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: XML and Ada was RE: A standard package for config files is needed References: <3CFA3F25.118C9989@san.rr.com> From: Stephen Leake Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-GC-Trace: gv1-s1KKyBqJRhbYkLxwvAW8avPxc5S1abpQkbF304= NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 07:31:47 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv3-Yu5UgccxtnYsNccVaiB5/TbaXMDnz6GJgAl/OhSmqMxYoP0fb/ZDubgHnf7sf3avD1o+c/wQjn3mdbN!3geFFx/Skkocl5yKUvoz9ys+79NjiUaKZ2wr2eMw7YCXb9fWbBhErFY= X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:31:47 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25662 Date: 2002-06-10T12:31:47+00:00 List-Id: "Eric G. Miller" writes: > >> Stephen Leake wrote: > > I think my problem is I have no idea how to go about using a DTD. In > > particular, the Glib.XML package does _not_ support validation. > > That seems odd, since libxml2 supports DTD validation (they're in the > process of adding XML schemas...). But, I'm not familiar with the > Glib binding Glib.XML from GtkAda is not a binding, it's a simple implementation of a very small subset of XML. > (I imagine a GLIB2 binding would bring in libxml2...). Seems it'd be > useful to have an independent binding for libxml2 so you don't have > to bring glib into the picture if you don't need/want it and also > get full access to all the functionality (I think GLIB just > implements/uses a small subset). Sounds like a good idea. Are you volunteering ? :). -- -- Stephe