From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b04385af440bf119 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Alain Le Guennec Subject: Re: pretty-print? and ada specific debugger? Date: 1998/10/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 399048471 Distribution: world Sender: aleguenn@myrtille.irisa.fr References: <6vh09g$mcl$1@usenet43.supernews.com> Organization: IRISA, Rennes, France Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-10-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "alan walkington" writes: > 2. the gdb which came with linux's gcc development system is pretty > Ada95-stupid. > Is there a gnat-enhanced gdb I should be using? Take a look at gdb-4.16.gnat.1.13.diff.gz in the gdb/ directory on any GNAT ftp mirror. It provides better support for Ada95 in gdb. /Alain Le Guennec, not speaking for IRISA.