From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f92fbb4a0420dd57
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: shochat@roosevelt.logicon.com (David Shochat)
Subject: Re: some questions re. Ada/GNAT from a C++/GCC user
Date: 1996/04/02
Message-ID: <wgcn34u71kr.fsf@roosevelt.logicon.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 145503974
sender: shochat@roosevelt.logicon.com
references: <3160B03B.5230@mcs.com>
organization: Logicon Information Technology Group
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <3160B03B.5230@mcs.com> Mike Young <mikey@mcs.com> writes:

    Mike> ======= I'm confused. I thought I read an explicit rule (in
    Mike> Barne's book) that no order of evaluation was specified for
    Mike> declarations.

RM95 3.11/7:
"The elaboration of a declarative_part consists of the elaboration of 
the declarative_items, if any, in the order in which they are given 
in the declarative_part."

Maybe you were thinking of the actual parameters in a subprogram call 
(6.4/10).
-- 
David Shochat
dshochat@logicon.com  shochat@roosevelt.logicon.com