From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,71b4c0131a8a22a4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Corrected version Re: pragma License ? References: From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:47:54 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CqMSMLtHHKayOv5dayYuhBmz2DQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.236.123 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1182076691 88.72.236.123 (17 Jun 2007 12:38:11 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16218 Date: 2007-06-17T12:47:54+02:00 List-Id: > > Plus, using this feature does look more professional. Because the line: > > pragma License ( GPL ) ; > > is a lot easier to use than to insert the following set of lines > (GNAT version) in each file: > > -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under -- <...> Hardly. I don't think "pragma License ( GPL )" can have any legal meaning. A clear text notice has, though (all rumours notwithstanding). Regards -- Markus