From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a644fa9cd1a3869a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-28 09:34:32 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
References: 
 <3BECA3B7.5020702@telepath.com><3BF0247D.4500975E@san.rr.com><5BXH7.22252$xS6.34813@www.newsranger.com><3BF052D3.ECEF3FF2@san.rr.com><dibI7.23087$xS6.35921@www.newsranger.com><3BF19FF8.7FE097EF@boeing.com><3BF27410.C899A16B@brighton.ac.uk><pOvI7.24339$xS6.38484@www.newsranger.com><3BF3EDE5.FE0ED701@brighton.ac.uk><SLbK7.30473$xS6.49203@www.newsranger.com>
 <700ht9.6k1.ln@127.0.0.1> <9tht9a$2j1ni$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>
 <3piL7.34607$xS6.59455@www.newsranger.com> <9u0rkd$q9k$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3C049C06.DF85EF80@angelfire.com> <9u2scm$lqg$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
Subject: Re: List container strawman 1.2
Message-ID: <we9N7.40988$xS6.68991@www.newsranger.com>
X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please
X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or
X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:34:20 EST
Organization: http://www.newsranger.com
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:34:20 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17114
Date: 2001-11-28T17:34:20+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9u2scm$lqg$1@nh.pace.co.uk>, Marin David Condic says...
>
>I knew that their *behavior* is defined in terms of 'Read and 'Write, but I
>did not know that you would get them to come along free for the cost of
>defining your own overrides for 'Read and 'Write. I was under the impression
>that you'd still have to make your own procedures and do a for-use. If this
>is not the case, then great - nice to get something as a freebie.

That's what I thought for a while too, but I belive Tucker corrected me on that
point a while back. My memory of it is pretty bad, so perhaps we need another
language-lawyer to step in here.

If you think about it though, it really *needs* to be that way. How could you
possibly implement your own version of 'Class'Input yourself?

---
T.E.D.    homepage   - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. 
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.