From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,330ec86e1824a689 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-29 07:31:44 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Run-Time Type Assignment Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:30:20 GMT References: <5ee5b646.0208280304.614d11fc@posting.google.com> <3D6E271B.538FDF52@equipement.gouv.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28553 Date: 2002-08-29T14:30:20+00:00 List-Id: SIMON Claude writes: > Does a "limited access procedure" could be THE solution ? Yes. Two solutions were proposed during the Ada 9X design. That was one of them. I think the other involved some sort of run-time accessibility-level checking (like access parameters). Neither feature made it into the language. - Bob