From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-22 14:51:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc Subject: Re: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bit addressing and OOP Date: 22 Apr 2003 17:50:56 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <3E4E8F8C.9C096985@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0302250710.5549baaf@posting.google.com> <3E5C7033.BD5DC462@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0302260618.7506cba7@posting.google.com> <3E5CF5C6.84822F57@adaworks.com> <8qkczsAcGcn+Ew83@nildram.co.uk> <3EA04A1E.CAFC1FEF@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0304221126.7112b7d5@posting.gOrganization: LJK Software NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1051048259 8824 199.172.62.241 (22 Apr 2003 21:50:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:50:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:62514 comp.object:61608 comp.lang.ada:36378 misc.misc:13565 Date: 2003-04-22T17:50:56-04:00 List-Id: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > In article <9fa75d42.0304221126.7112b7d5@posting.google.com>, softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng) writes: > > > Also, Ada proponents made much of its strong > > typing. But it was not at all novel or revolutionary. > > It was a very common language idea > > at that time, and then-popular Pascal had it too. > > As a Pascal programmer I was thrilled to use Ada since the typing > system is so much stronger than in Pascal. Much more flexible, too. - Bob