From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8bfa8c460ead1701
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problems with dynamic allocation in tasks
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:45:33 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcczm1kfn4i.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <1185379864.592973.73220@b79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1185381933 13038 192.74.137.71 (25 Jul 2007 16:45:33
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:45:33 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g8Ek1hONOOKFEXtMCu1jwsR+xKk=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1174
Date: 2007-07-25T12:45:33-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

ldb <ldb_nospam@hotmail.com> writes:

>...Ideally, i'd be able to
> create a task-local memory pool that doesn't require a mutex for these
> allocations.. not sure how feasible this is in Ada, though.

It's quite feasible.  Look up storage pools (section 13.11 in the RM).

- Bob