From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,af0c6ea85f3ed92d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr18649156pbv.0.1329843517101;
        Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni51961pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Arbitrary Sandbox
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:58:36 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcczkcc6s3n.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <bfeb9869-9323-4ad5-bdf8-af20593734ef@q8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <2aaee0a4-e820-4a75-bbaf-d9d09c366d2c@f5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <4da4bf75-e6c9-4c17-9072-ab6f533ed93f@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <jh7739$9os$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <203d63cf-42a9-49ef-82cd-943d77b5e438@c21g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <jhh6qr$9av$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <e10bf38c-3c48-4fa4-bb0a-e61211aee90d@f30g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <193cr8xol0ysi.14p4cp2yxnb0r$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9veuwe6ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <1jleu301thnd3$.s23priwn3ajb$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccobswc6ob.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <18o3vqsl9uy2$.a3m68cg8ysro.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccvcn1nl0x.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <4f435a29$0$7608$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1329843516 16013 192.74.137.71 (21 Feb 2012 16:58:36
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:58:36 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hKS4QopcR23d1WXiseVOe55H5Go=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-02-21T11:58:36-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> writes:

> How does using Java prevent trouble in this case?
> I mean, the notion of JNI checking (if that's a close relative of
> Ada's unchecked constructs) shows that Java is no better in this case,
> asking programmers to be careful.

Good point.  But Java-without-JNI is a possibility.

- Bob