From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e8e240cec570cdf2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-19 14:53:31 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.edgix.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Multiple entry tasks
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccy9sw7e28.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:52:15 GMT
References: <slrn9dralj.k4.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
	<9bkevj$61k$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <vOkD6.1839$D4.178910@www.newsranger.com>
	<9bkqud$a5b$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:7021
Date: 2001-04-19T21:52:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marin David Condic" <marin.condic.auntie.spam@pacemicro.com> writes:

> Cascading the selects is an interesting mechanism. I'm not sure there is any
> answer that will be definitive. (Short of a language mod allowing one to
> prioritize entries?)

Under the Priority_Queueing policy, the entries are prioritized -- you
write the higher-priority accepts before the lower-priority ones.  Task
priorities take precedence over entry priorities, however.  I'm not
sure whether that's what the original poster wanted, but if all the
tasks are the same priority, then the order of the accept statements
determines the priority of the entries.

See RM-D.4(14).

- Bob