From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32fe290813aec20 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elk.ncren.net!NNTP.WPI.EDU!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New Ada portable GUI Library? Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:59:12 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <3LqdnZ0ffYYPeg3anZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@comcast.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1200682753 10183 192.74.137.71 (18 Jan 2008 18:59:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:59:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/QKley6r+o9FnVe6HxZuzgaHJTs= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19466 Date: 2008-01-18T13:59:12-05:00 List-Id: >> If you develop code from scratch, you probably don't want -gnatE. >> GNAT will impose some fairly minor restrictions on you, >> and in return you get a statically determined elaboration >> order that will work, and you don't have to mess around >> with the various elaboration control pragmas. And you >> can avoid the run-time overhead of elaboration checks on >> every call. tmoran@acm.org writes: > Does that mean the designers of Ada's elaboration got it wrong? Yes. - Bob