From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ba19b629e3223dba X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Q: Protected types and entries (long) Date: 1999/03/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 449993119 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <36C98180.98296205@siemens.at> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Erik Margraf writes: > ...Since the reference to a formal parameter of an entry is not > allowed [in a barrier],... When you wish you could do that, it often makes sense to use an entry family. The family index behaves somewhat like a parameter, but you *can* use it in the barrier. Another alternative is requeue, which you already knew. - Bob -- Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.