From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Desirability of C++
Date: 2000/05/03
Message-ID: <wccwvlb5kab.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 618902485
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: 
 <390DEC7F.9429C82C@online.no><LnoP4.768$Q_.926416@news.pacbell.net><390E2A20.B647D0D6@maths.unine.ch>
 <8em8mb$evd$1@wanadoo.fr><390EEF24.BD36AA24@maths.unine.ch>
 <wcc4s8gdhqk.fsf@world.std.com> <8eonat$sqj3@ftp.kvaerner.com>
 <8eoo6v$ers$1@wanadoo.fr> <391060A6.7ABCDCFE@cadence.com>
 <8eptms$7vq$1@wanadoo.fr> <3910840C.57847EF3@cadence.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Paul Graham <pgraham@cadence.com> writes:

> It is annoying when an "improved" version of a type loses some
> operations over the basic version.  So much for "referential
> transparency".

True, although I miss indexing and literals more than attributes.

> Or is it possible to write something like:
> 
>     for Bounded_String'Length use Length(Bounded_String);
> 
> ?

No.  That's not allowed.

- Bob