From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f25e853f410d55da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Dynamicly declaring arrays (was: Time to join the fold?) Date: 1999/02/03 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 440263384 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <78abg4$cnc$1@its.hooked.net> <78i8s4$hth$1@its.hooked.net> <78iq2m$br9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <794gg7$ib$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7963q0$ail$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7973lb$mdl$1@remarQ.com> <797595$ede@drn.newsguy.com> <797io4$jt7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <797q7f$r60$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36B7996F.500F@lanl.gov> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: William Clodius writes: >...There was a strong feeling > by many observers that the extensions and the reliance on VDM got out of > hand, given that Wirth's original definition was, I believe, well under > 50 pages. Wirth's language descriptions are quite short, primarily because he tends to leave out a lot of important details, IMHO. That's his style. I would expect a definition of any of Wirth's languages, suitable for standardization, would be much longer than Wirth's original, even if there were *no* extensions or use of VDM. - Bob -- Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.