From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses. Date: 1999/09/29 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530683815 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky> <7smp30$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <7sp914$ago$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7splaj$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd. (David Starner) writes: > One minor problem in Ada that MI could help is the special > Controlled classes. Either your base class is derived from > it, or it isn't and that limits your subclasses. ... If your base class is not derived from controlled, it's easy enough to add controlledness by adding a *component* whose type is derived from controlled. There's no need to make everything controlled from the start, "just in case" you want a Finalize op somewhere down in the hierarchy. - Bob -- Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.