From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6d543b1cb62702
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: package child question
Date: 2000/02/09
Message-ID: <wccvh3y3tn7.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 583855597
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: <87mugk$sa3$1@news-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <87oi6t$jd$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <950043074.13382.0.nnrp-08.c2de848f@news.demon.co.uk>
 <87rava$8dv$1@wanadoo.fr>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-02-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jean-Pierre Rosen" <rosen.adalog@wanadoo.fr> writes:

> A funny and unfortunate effect of automatic lines folding!
> I wrote "start with Standard", I didn't suggest to have a "with standard;".

Well, *I* understood what you said.  Besides, "with" is not a verb in
English.  Why did JDI choose it, instead of, say, "use" or "import"?
The RM says "mention in a with clause", but that's too long, so people
say "to with, or not to with".  ;-)

- Bob